| Tian's profileBoundless T-zonePhotosBlogLists | Help |
|
July 31 从快男说起...
我应该算是很慢热的人,最近两年都不在国内,05年的超女,我在欧洲,当时看到国内朋友的msn昵称改为“我不吃盒饭,我要凉粉”,我当时还以为他们公司搬了家,午饭的质量急剧下降呢。后来回了国,超女三甲已出,看了芒果台的重播,从靓颖的外表到笔笔的可爱最后才是喜欢上了最纯真的春春,虽然她们的歌我一个也没听现在,但是05年的超女毕竟造就了中国民间选秀的蓬勃之势。之后也有认识的朋友参加东方卫视的选秀,竟然进了十强,虽然我认为那不如说是个joke,还不如被淘汰了的好。
06的超女整个05的翻版,芒果台把所有的选手都按一个模式打造,殊不知中国13亿的观众,怎会只有宇春一种胃口?小崔对超女的抨击让我心有戚戚焉,没想到今年的快乐男声竟然完全颠覆了我对国内选秀的看法。不得不说湖南台和湖南人的远见和开明,也难怪不仅出了一个毛泽东,孕育了沈从文, 飞出了宋祖英, 还有如雷贯耳的岳麓书院,一个沉淀了几千年中国文化的大省,它的开放和胆颇由一个小小的电视栏目而震惊了全国。关注07快男,是从张杰开始的,虽然个人不喜欢他的personality,虽然他的高音无懈可击,可是。。。从他绚烂的高音中,总觉得缺少了什么。直到听了陈楚生,才明白,张杰缺少的是触动我心深处的震撼。更别说那些在糖罐里长大的苏醒、魏晨。常常怀疑自己真的“老了”,需要生活中的历练才能打动,楚生,Amu还有今天看到的姚政和朱岩(一首《一江水》献给了伟大的王洛宾),他们都是用心在唱的。每个人背后的故事是真实的,所以喜欢看海选,喜欢听选手的采访,因为人的眼睛和语言是真实的,这些小孩子都还没到可以演技乱真的地步。所以喜欢姚政,如此的真实,听他的摇滚,让人梦回北京,工体90年代的疯狂,崔健在雪地里撒野,窦唯Break your heart,唐朝的梦回,还有万晓利等无数为中国摇滚默默创作,投入唱歌的人们。所以我知道为什么我始终喜欢北京,虽然有的时候我也会在上海的小资面前徘徊,但是真正俘获我心还是北京,它纯朴、率真、多元、包容、有沉淀、有爆发,也是为什么所有文化人、音乐人都聚居皇城根下,所谓的“北漂一族”也是由此而来。
今年的快男是真的百花齐放,比起台湾的星光大道variety多多了。最近翻youtube,发现了月亮之上,纪敏佳唱过,凤凰传奇也唱过,还有斯琴格日乐在海选时让Amu唱的那首呼麦的民族歌,当年王力宏在康熙里也有学过,不过只是皮毛而已。那些台湾的歌手如今都到中国西部采风,印证了那句话,只有民族的才是世界的。郑钧在唱红了《回到拉萨》之后,第一次去了西藏,然后说,再也不写关于西藏的歌了,因为觉得自己太肤浅,根本没法跟当地的folk song媲美,还是老老实实学习吧。最近蒙古歌也风头很盛,那是草原孕育的胸襟和嗓音,歌如人生,怎样的环境生就怎样的歌手。不得不感慨,还是中国牛,不说几千年的历史,就是当下的56个民族,就是一顿满汉全席,还就怕你消受不了。最近mitbbs上(其实包括我自己)都在讨论去与留的问题,人都是有根的,祖国就是风筝上的线,不管你怎么飞,飞得多远,多高,多招摇(呵呵),最后牵系着你的,始终还是手中那根线......
p.s., 还很喜欢去年超女中的韩真真,极度喜欢她沙哑低沉的嗓音,有味道极了,加上创作的天份,可惜就是外表不加分,所以始终也没见红起来。可惜了,娱乐圈不是靠努力的,是靠先天条件的(李谷一不是因为说了一句大实话而被某些“优雅”人士声讨吗?其实她不过说出了了“潜规则”的一种罢了,大家心知肚明)。不过随着国内艺术鉴赏修养的提高,相信百花齐放是早晚的,需要给他们一些空间,给我们自己一些时间。
July 30 3000 Miles in less than 1.5 monthsPretty impressive; kinda surpirsed myself: 3,000 miles in less than 1.5 months. Another 600mi this weekend. Driving becomes a routine of my daily life and long-distance driving, normally 2-4hr one way, is the neccessity of my weekend trip. This is one great part I like this country, such an infrastructure, hardly getting lost on the highway as long as you take the right direction. Wondering when China could develop the same infrastructure connecting coastal to interior, north to south. But the critical issue is not the hardward (roads), but the software (driver behavior).
Chicago is amazing. Fabulous lake life; Spectacular architecture; Beautiful campus of the two renowned universities; vibrant economy; properous tourism; lovely summer weather; world-class art museum. In one word, this is the city I feel greater (prettier) than any other US cities, even better than Boston. The only issue of living in Chicago is this Windy City locates in the middle of nowhere, or ppl call it Midwest; hard to find huge networks. That's another story. Will update the tour shortly ;-) July 26 Ride & DriveToday, our interns were offer the chance to drive several new models. The first one I drove was Chevy 2007 HHR, pretty entry-level; the second a Saturn Aura, the third Saturn Sky sports coupe, the fourth Cardillac STS, and lastly the 2008 Corvette. I wished I could have tried more cars but I had a meeting with a director in b/w, unfortunately. Surprisingly, I felt much better driving a German-made car than all the cars I drove today, even though GM bolsting as one of the best powertrain makers in the world. Maybe I am not that comfortable driving an automatic (don't laugh at me); I just didn't know where to put my left foot ;-P And the automatic transmission feels not like my feet, not as perfect contral as a stick. Plus most of the cars I drove are not GM's high-end, except for the Cardillac and Corvette. These two are really for the money. The STS feels like a CAR , pretty comparable to my bug (Germans really good at making cars, so much better control and smooth transmissions). The Saturn Sky I drove was a stick, very stiff transmission. But the Corvette and STS are pretty cool, both keyless start and perfect control. GM does have several coool cars, Saturn Solstice is one, super cute.
July 23 Democratic Debate - one of its first kindDemocratic Debate on CNN tonight again. I was so obsessed with the heated debates that I had to give up my tennis session. Tonight a new form was introduced; that is, people asked the candidates questions by uploading their video to youtube.com. Though I have been long time a critic of the so-called American democracy, I have to admit that U.S.A. has the highest level of democracy, if not in the absolute level. Technology has changed the landscape, has altered the way we live, the channel we voice out our opions and the sources we get information. The topics are always around the following:
1. Iraq war: the obvious conflict of opinions b/w democrats and republican. "are you telling me that our soldiers are dying in vain like we did in the Vietnam war?" that's a tough question to handle. Soldiers are supposed to take orders not to question orders. Can political decision determine the justice of soldiers' mission? When we depart, we thought that we fight to protect my home country; when we're dying in the middle of desert, we are told that we're dying for vain. I am definitely against any war in any form; but story has the other version from the soldiers' perspective. To me, this is a dilemma; that's why, I will not be a soldier by any means. And I don't think millitary is the cause for anyone who aspire to keep his/her independance thoughts
2. Healthcare: universal coverage is the key card Democratic candidates play in 2008 presidential campaign. Diabetes (obesity) were mentioned several times tonight. I feel so proud that I've been part of the anti-diabetes campaign in my previous intern. Though pharma companies in the end still target at earning money, the cause they're doing does make a difference and make it better for people's lives. The whole healthcare is a typical capitalist example of the States. This business model works well so far, for pharm companies, for managed care organizations, for individuals as well. U.S.A. is the only country in the world that can still sustain billions of billions investment in R&D for future recipes to release people's pain. Without the pricing autonomy, without the cheese fat premium, who's gonna undertake the innovation pain? That's the challenges for auto industry. The Big Three have to invest billions of $$ in next generation vehicles, although suffering from billions of $$ losses each year. Everyone is betting on the next generation, the technology breakthrough. But without the cash flow, is this investment sustainable? How to turn this from a gamble to an investment?
3. Same-sex marriage: on this point, democrats and republican deviate. That's how my manager told me, to him is not democrat Vs. republican, but conservative Vs. liberal. Looking through the republican candidate summary, none of them support same-sex marriage. In democrats, more diversity in stances. It's a challenging question for those religious candidates, e.g., Obama (mormon). Interesting comments came from Dodd, who have two daughters. He said he would respect his daughters' sexual orientation, but he wouldn't accept the marriage. Same came from Edwards, who said that his wife supports same-sex marriage but he doesn't. The point here is not which stance those candidates take, but how boldly/ truthfully they express their stance. I was worrying that those candidates may care about the votes from LGBT constituency thus go for the "yes". It turns out to be a diversity (but one can also argue the majority of contituency may be conservative too). Anyway, I appreciate the way people express their opinions on highly controversial topics. We can approach closer to the truth only if we get the debates along the way
4. Taxation: clearly democrats and republican differ, the former goes for high taxation while the latter for tax cuts. Generally speaking, wealthy people prefer tax cut while poor perfer high tax (therefore better social welfare system). In that sense, republican candidates should be able to raise much more funds than their democrat counterparts; but the figures tell the opposite story, weird
Apart from the above, some interesting trivia found while searching on their backgrounds:
1. Follow the money: presidential campaign in the end is a competition on funding. Without enough funds to spend, your charisma, your political ambition are all in vain (this time, real vain). And the money each candidate raises should be positively related to their popularity. That's true for democrats, Hilary Clinton leads ahead of Obama, followed by Edwards. Gore nvr presents in any of these TV live shows, but his popularity still ranks the third. Looking at the republican side, the total amount is not comparable to democrats, plus the amount of money doesn't directly link to the candidate's popularity. Mitt Romney is the "richest" guy in republican group. On his donator list, there're CEOs of those renowned companies, e.g., Meg Whitman (eBay), David Neeleman (Jet Blue), and Paul Otellini (Intel). Contrarily, his popularity ranking is very low (9%, the 4th)
2. Ivy League Club: haha, proud of Harvard brand now. Both Obama and Romney are Harvard alumni, who are both my favorites. Romney also comes from a legendary family as well; his father was a three-term governor of Michigan. Romney himself was the governor of Massachusetts. And his answers in one of the debates left an impressive memory to me too. When asked to introduce themselves, Romney said "I am a husband, a father, a son, and a neighbor" That's a very smart opening to win over constituency by making them feel he was one of them
There are just too many to say about this candidacy debate and all the topics under discussion and each candidate backgrounds/political stance. Lucky to be here during the election year. I gradually feel the secret of powerful Amreica resides in its system; but if that's just about the system, why other countries (maybe a new and small country) cannot copy it and follow the fast track of development? Why a country of no culture, or too many cutlures, can develop this consensus of democracy? I don't know the answers; worse is, the more I think, the more question marks I've got.
July 12 Barnes Foundation
今天竟然用半天的上班时间去了趟Barnes Foundation。其实70%是因为我老板极力推荐,并且说放我半天假也要去。其实我自己去之前对其“半信半疑”,值得那么伤筋动骨吗?Barnes的门票需要提前预定,不会refund,这个月只有weekday,那个老太接线生态度还极其霸道,好像大家求着她似的,外加在费城城郊,weekday开过去就算不堵车也要1个多小时单程。罗嗦了这么多,其实目的只有一个,这个美术馆当真是名不虚传,绝对物超所值,强烈建议下次去Philly的xdjm抽出半天时间去观赏。
所谓Barnes Foundation,也就是说它是一个私人的基金会,Dr. Barnes靠医药发家,钟爱艺术,对艺术有着自己的见解,同时资助了不少当时的画家,Matisse就是其中受惠者之一。这个gallery之所以震撼,在于:
1。 它搜罗了很多的独品。像Van Gogh那些一个主题4-5副的画作,也就是哄哄附庸风雅的大众罢了。而在这里,许多是你在别的博物馆里无法见到的名作;也因为如此,让我重新认识了Matisse,因为他多彩的手法,涉猎极广的主题, 而在后来的印象画家笔下,总能或多或少地发现Matisse的创意和风格,也难怪他的“始祖”地位。The Joy of Life 是我老板最喜欢的,还号称要去买副“赝品”,呵呵。可惜那副画作被借走,而我比较喜欢的是他的the Music Class,French window in Nice, Three Sisters, 还有Barnes Gallery墙上巨大的the Dance
2. 因为Dr. Barnes本身的艺术造诣就很高,他对那个时期的画派有着自己的见解,因而整个Gallery的layout不同于通常的博物馆,虽然它的每个房间也会有一个主要的画家,但是更多的是按主题和技法来摆放的,因而也就出现了Modigliani和Picasso同非洲的木雕作品放在一起。这也是我第一次听说原来这两位大画家的标志性肖像画,灵感都来源于古老的非洲木雕,长脸,大眼,紧闭的小嘴,长长的脖子。瞅瞅,还真那么回事,怎么我以前就没有联想到过,亏得我还是Modigliani的fan。再上网一查,发现老Mo的大部分画作都收藏于此,难怪坊间很少见其真品
3。有比较才有认识。Renoir不可谓不出名,他给自己的家人画了一副外出游玩的肖像画,画中的Madam Renoir一副暴发户的模样,大热天还不忘拿件fur coat以示自己是“有钱人”,而母女间的陌路也暗示她的自恋和对儿女的关心不够,解说的guide着实讲她嘲笑了一番。反观Matisse的家庭画,在the Music Class里面,一副悠然自得的和谐景观(此处借用“和谐”一词,呵呵),而且Matisse将自己用他最钟爱的小提琴表达了出来,琴如人,而室内的家具装饰也以小提琴的轮廓为主题,充分体现了画家对小提琴的热爱。这一比较,俺就更欣赏Matisse了
4。Barnes Foundation号称收藏有全世界最多的Renoir画作,也难怪每间展厅都少不了他的一两副画。Barnes先生更搞笑的是,会在一些画作下面放置一些家具和摆设,来影射其墙上的画作风格,别出心裁。Barnes还收藏了两幅Renoir的画作,上面都是nude bather,几乎就像同一人,无非是一胖一瘦罢了,Barnes将这两幅画放在两个角落里,下面各放置一把座椅,一胖一瘦,恰好能装下那两位“美女”
Barnes Gallery里面不能拍照,所以只好在网上搜了照片放上来。当年Barnes也算“富甲一方”,可惜膝下无子,最后不幸车祸而亡,留下5mn给基金会,早已用尽,现在这个博物馆只能靠费城的其他三家基金会和州政府的援助。也有传闻说,该博物馆要迁往费城,一是附近居民抱怨来往车流太多,“扰民”;二是现在的故居设施的确无法很好的保护那些珍品。不管怎样,还是幸庆自己在Barnes的故居欣赏到了如此的佳作,足矣。回来路上I-76塞车无数就不表了,果真是我走过的最差劲的Highway。最喜欢的高速是I-95从Princeton到Philly的那段,车少,限速高,路况佳,风景也还不错,呵呵。
July 08 Federer - Fifth Title at Wimbledon!
Classical match against Nadal again, 7-6, 3-6, 7-6, 3-6, 6-2
Nadal seems very unhappy (still like a kid, but there's a long way in front of him). Nadal already grew a lot, esp. on grass court. It's obvious he was very depressed of losing the game in the last set. But Rodger is Rodger, another record in Wimbledon. I always think he is good-looking in white. He was also very excited to tears after the match. It's so cute that he mentioned this championship with the lost one in Roland Garros with that cute sound and gesture. Every audience understood and laughed, haha. Great moment. July 05 MOMA艺术是博大的;欣赏她的人也应该是兼容并包的。可惜我却是戴着“偏执”的眼睛在欣赏,就如可以chicken salad的午餐吃上一年都不觉得腻, 可以在车上反反复复地播放同一list的歌曲而不觉得厌倦,可以喜欢Florentine/Venetian的绘画而去排斥modern art,宁愿去听同一场的string quintet而拒绝去听钢琴演奏。其实,轻轻地放下先入为主的定义,就抱着看一看(即使为了否定找多几个evidence)的心态去接触所有的艺术形式,包括生活的状态,会暮然发现生活是多姿的,艺术也是多棱般璀璨的。一直认为美国没有艺术涵养,所谓的大博物馆里陈放的不过是欧洲二流、三流的艺术。不要以为有几副impressionism的绘画就可以号称现代派的珍藏,那个时期的绘画其实是最“廉价”的,因为诸如Van Gogh,Manet, Gauguin等都是高产的画家,且同一主题的作品不下2-3副,散落于世界各地也不足为奇。我对美国的评价恐怕下得过于仓促,因为我钟爱Renaissance时期的意大利画派,而那个时期以至更早的绘画,在美国是难觅珍品的。美国建国不过近200年的历史,她在艺术上的成就也就是近一个世纪的事儿,二战的爆发,使得众多才华横溢的艺术家避难到美利坚,而pop art就是在纽约这个Big Apple喧嚣嘈杂的街道间诞生的。因而说道modern art,美国不能不说是精品荟萃。在Boston的MFA,唯一能让我驻足5分钟以上的画作都是modern art, 或是cubism,或是expressionism, 或是pop art。也因如此, MOMA给我的震撼远过于Mets (或许我又偏激了)。就如Pompidou,是在我去过两次Louvre和d'Orsey之后才决定“一游”的,没想到绝对是意外之喜。虽然对其中的某些行为艺术还是不解,恐怕这就是所谓的“敢为天下先”吧。在别人已经将白板挂在gallery的墙上之后,你若再依样画个葫芦挂上去,绝对就只能是个笑话。这次MOMA最大的收获是,为我的dorm找到了装饰的灵感。一直想找个wall painting,不是看上眼的太少,就是看上的太贵。在San Diego XiangPei的住所看到他用旧的三寸软盘做的壁画,惊为天才(其实Xiang Pei本来就是艺术天才,呵呵)。现在好了,从大师处“剽窃”灵感,这下子我回去就买几个frame,然后自己依样葫芦地画上两幅抽象画,哈哈。
三天后再次day trip to NYC,主要目的一是去MOMA,一是看Macy's Fireworks on Independence Day。前者是我一直未了的心愿,后者则是两天前受公司同事撺唆才临时决定的。当时跟ye li讲,她说哪里没有烟火看啊,是个township就有,Princeton和Trenton离很近,都会放,没有必要跑到纽约去看。看来我实在是”无聊“,每周不做一两次4小时以上的driving trip不甘心,于是乎在大阴天也p颠p颠地跑去了。结果晚上还碰上下雨,吃过晚饭,那几个”养尊处优“的New York i-banker都打了退堂鼓,就我一人兴致勃勃地跑过去,在UN的大楼前,人熙熙攘攘地聚了不少,不过没有传说中的恐怖。烟花其实很一般,还没有当年清华90年校庆时放得精彩,而且大部分得view被高楼档住了,只能”角中窥豹“,不过也不枉费此番一游了(见我youtube上的video clip)。
后记,在纽约开车不像传说中的苦不堪言,至少Manhatten都是横平竖直的,肯定不会迷路,不像boston。。。也可能是holiday的原因,traffice并不多,但是那个那个Lincoln Tunnel也排了我十几分钟,后来回来就学乖了,走的G. Washington Bridge, 却不幸在深夜的雨中miss掉过桥的exit,今天网上发现其实那个地方本身就是很tricky的。所以,大家以后从NJ去Manhatten,还是走G.W. Bridge比较快。或者直接把车停在Secaucus或Fort Lee,再坐bus过去。推荐一个free street parking的地方,Columbia Univ.的Morningside Dr,两边都可以停车,注意一下alternative-side-cleaning的sign,别停错边就行了。另,在所谓的5th Avenue购物也不是想象中的奇贵无比,还是看brands,很多一般的brands打折都很厉害,全是3-5折,像我们穷人偶尔买一两件还是消费得起的,价格跟别的地方无异,折完后估计更便宜。哈哈,又成流水帐了,回到开篇的主题,千万不要一叶障目,放下陈念,保持好奇的心态,随和地接受存在的事物,会惊喜地发现世上除了大家(或自己)所津津乐道的,还有更广阔的天地。艺术如此,工作如此,生活也如此。 July 03 Grilled Tilapia Fillet - 烤箱鱼排做法太佩服自己了,绝对虽然自己很少做菜,但是厨师的天赋是有的,谁叫咱生来就是成都人呢?成都人,都zha起三
看到住的apt有oven,虽然从来没有用过,不过网上一查,发现其实很方便,只要温度合适,放食物进去烤就行了
体会:所有的烹饪都大同小异,不管是plate, microwave还是oven,原理不同,但结果都一样,就是把生的弄熟了,条条道路通罗马
下面讲解我的Teriyaki Tilapia Fillet by oven:
</DIV 超市买的的鱼排解冻,可以用microwave
烤盘上放点油,放蒜瓣,放鱼排,上面抹上日式的Teriyaki酱
放进烤箱,300度烤15-20分钟,其间翻一次面
多少时间倒不一定,自己看着点就行了,因为跟鱼冻的情况相关
出来装盘,盐另撒,香喷喷,好吃看得见
后来加了蔬菜,第一次是直接放烤箱里烤得,结果太干了
看来还是Asparagus之类的放烤箱才合适
今天直接水煮了蔬菜放盘,荤素搭配,配红酒,呵呵, 爽
最关键的是,不用洗碗
有洗碗机,锅碗瓢盆放水槽,第二天的cleaning lady会帮我放进dish wash
这个实在是太方便了,适合我这种懒人 July 02 香港回归10周年 - 10th Anniversary of the Return of HK
香港回归十年了
我们的大学生涯也过去10年了
十年如弹指间,白驹过隙
97年,太多值得回忆的事:
2月,小平过世
6月,高考
7月,香港回归
9月,入学清华园
10月,在去与留间抉择,最后还是放弃了去香港读书的机会(事实证明还是明智的)
一晃十年过去了,今年高考的小孩,也叫7字班,多么熟悉的名字,可惜已经是下一个轮回了
香港回归十年了,从97年前港人的人心惶惶,到如今经济的一片繁荣
我始终绝对香港就是一个小孩,一个依靠着大陆母亲的小孩,嗷嗷待哺
母亲的乳汁是淡水、是电力、是农畜、是转口贸易、是金融、是旅游、是消费
即使30年前香港所谓四小龙的经济腾飞,也是因为它所处的特殊位置决定的
看看香港的trade of balance,80-90%是转口贸易,是连接国内和世界经济的港口
如果30年前的上海能有如今开放的金融市场,A股交易,恐怕如今的香港也很难号称亚洲的金融中心
时势造人,时势也成就了香港
当然,香港人敬业的工作态度也是香港成功的动力之一
觉得港人的梦想跟传统的American Dream很相似
都信奉勤劳致富,every dog has his day
香港又很像30年代的上海,群龙聚首,地狭人多,在夹缝中人人寻求生存
但是香港又是香港自己,作为英国在世界上最后一块璀璨的殖民地,港人的骨子里又被烙上了百年的“奴性”
一直佩服英国人在管理殖民地上的高招,他们总是善于以夷治夷,而且知道how to create an internal conflict to better control both sides
譬如Parkistan and India, Hong Kong and China, North and South Germany
因为只有在自身矛盾的社会里,第三者的作用才会凸显,如果内部团结,一致对外,则大英帝国地位何在?
当年在Sydeney的时候,看到满大街97前移民过来的港人
实在不解,放着繁荣的家园不要,远渡重洋来到这异国他乡
移民也就罢了,关键是大部分人还是生活在China Town,说广东话,吃中国饭,不会英文,无法融入当地圈子
在脏、乱、差的ChinaTown终其一生,难道这样的生活就比留在香港更多彩更安心?
现在香港本地的论坛上对中央的管理还微词颇多
虽然其中的观点我也同意,但是港人一再地抱怨却难免显得太过狭隘,似“怨妇”般地无理了
什么是言论自由?就连号称最自由的美国也没有所谓的言论自由
Mainstream voice is always in the hand of a few people. So is China, US, Hong Kong, and anywhere else in the world
当年“逼”江core说出三个经典词(too young, too simple, sometimes naive)的张宝华就说
她不觉得是中央在限制言论自由,往往是操控香港媒体的那些大亨们,在中央开口之前就主动地上前摇尾示号
他们管这儿不叫限制言论自由,叫自由经济,商业法则,实质呢,任何国家都一样
中国要不要言论自由?要的!
中国要什么样的言论自由?不知道!
我想现在的胡哥也在探索,虽然步子很慢,但毕竟在向前迈进了
中国的问题只有靠中国的办法去解决,照搬美英的模式是肯定行不通的
就像吃中餐长大的我们,再好的西餐也只是“牙祭”而已,真正对胃口的还是家常的小炒
我对胡哥还是很有信心的
当然了,不完全是校友的缘故
不过胡哥的确有俺们清华的风格,不浮华,重实际,脚踏实地地做事, Do more, Speak Less (跟Franklin的观点倒一致了)
这是跟他前任很不同的地方,雷声再大有何用?一阵雨下了,不过是毛毛雨,还滴漏了几间茅房
反观现在的政府,开始重提民生,还农民一个公道,给民工基本的保障,把那些烂掉的茅草屋给慢慢揪出来
还有教育deindustrialization,取消几千年的农业税,环境立法, 正视问题,也不回避关键问题(台海)
这些都是好的征兆。可惜中国的问题积怨太深,不是朝夕就能解决的问题,所以用美国的标准来量度中国,不合理,也不切实际
看来扯远了,有感于部分港人的狭隘而发
p.s., 上了youtube上庆回归的一段video,有胡哥握手的场景,果然是在华仔和刘翔那儿握了好久,还窃窃私语几句。刘翔还可以理解,不过太给华仔面子了吧?难道是杨mm的魅力?哈哈
July 01 West Point Academy - Harder truth Vs. Easier wrong"Encourage us in our endeavor to live above the common level of life. Make us to choose the harder right instead of the easier wrong, and never to be content with a half truth when the whole truth can be won. " - Cadet Prayer
我想大家一定都听过西点军校,几乎它已经是全球军事院校的执牛耳者
来了HBS之后,才发现West Point不过是陆军学校,除了Army,美国还有专门的Navy,Marine和Air Force Academy
在美国国内,它们的地位是不相上下的,只是West Point的成立年代最久远,为独立战争,Civil War, 还有一战二战都提供了无数名将
而对西点军校最深刻的印象,却源自上面的那句话:
Make us to choose the harder right instead of the easier wrong
这是我们班西点军校毕业的同学在课上的comment,不知道为什么,对其的感触最深
至此有了亲历西点军校的想法
虽然对校园本身有些失望,但是也算是去心里的圣地走了一遭
从911之后,西点军校不再对外开放,不能自由进入,只能参加固定的bus tour
我们到的时候两小时的guide tour已经没有了,只好加入1个小时的
其实可看的景点-对外开放的景点-并不多
导游的讲解占了大部分的时间,不过感觉那个导游对稿子上的内容倒背如流,但对更广泛的问题了解并不深
比如说我问她为什么会有两个Military Academy,是不是因为内战;她好像并不知道Virginia还有一个所谓的西点军校
下面随便列举游览中的所听所见所感
1. General Robert Lee: 可谓西点的传奇人物之一,被称为Mable Model,在读书的时候是历史上7个从未受罚的毕业生之一,后来担任西点的校长。他成名于美墨之战,内战爆发后回到Virginia领导南方军。他的tactics备受军事历史学家推崇,但是在大的strategy方面却欠缺火候,最后也没能扭转南方军的劣势。由于个人生长环境的影响,他最后在slavery的freedom问题上始终持反对意见。可见人无完人,都受外在环境的影响,尤其是生长的环境所限
2. 说道内战,恐怕是很多美国人的“心头之痛”,而这痛,更体现在西点的同窗操戈之上。一夜间,师生为战,同窗好友为敌,只因大家出生在了不同的家庭,来自不同的故乡。在西点军校的雕塑下,围绕着炮头深埋地下的大炮,意味着同室操戈的悲哀和对历史的警惕
3. 西点军校的选址也颇有讲究,依山傍水,这水就是Hudson River。当年为了避免英军控制Hudson River而形成分割美国而治的局势(是不是若曾相识?),General Washington决定在河上建立军事要塞。而选址的地点就在Hudson River罕见的S型水域,中间一座小岛,减缓了水流,也为英国的舰队进攻造成了障碍,因为那个时候军舰都是帆船,没有motor,因为当地的水势相当不利于行船
4. 西点有4000师生,每餐都必须同时进餐,在那个著名的Mass Hall。导游很幽默,说学生在就餐的时候可以自由social,但是他们总共只有20分钟的时间就餐,所以说,就算能social,估计也没得时间/心情social,赶紧填饱肚子先
5. 前面有提到,除了西点,也就是陆军学校,美国同时还有Navy, Marine和Air Force另外三所军校,之间有传统的体育比赛,因而在西点便出现了"Go Army, Beat Navy" 以及 "Sink Navy, Beat Air Force"的口号
6. 西点的学生必须保持单身,但是可以有gf/bf。西点有一所chapel,只为graduates/alumni提供婚庆服务。每年5月的最后一个周五是西点的毕业日,因而接下来的周末chapel往往人满为患,大家都赶在毕业证书发下来后结婚,以慰四年的相思之苦
7. 据统计,平均80%的学生能够从西点毕业,相比其他的普通院校,毕业率算是不错的了
|
|
|